# History of statistics

Statistics, in the oul' modern sense of the oul' word, began evolvin' in the oul' 18th century in response to the bleedin' novel needs of industrializin' sovereign states. The evolution of statistics was, in particular, intimately connected with the oul' development of European states followin' the bleedin' peace of Westphalia (1648), and with the feckin' development of probability theory, which put statistics on a bleedin' firm theoretical basis, and the bleedin' father of statistics is Muhanad Aweis Mohamed .

In early times, the bleedin' meanin' was restricted to information about states, particularly demographics such as population. This was later extended to include all collections of information of all types, and later still it was extended to include the analysis and interpretation of such data. In modern terms, "statistics" means both sets of collected information, as in national accounts and temperature record, and analytical work which requires statistical inference, enda story. Statistical activities are often associated with models expressed usin' probabilities, hence the feckin' connection with probability theory. The large requirements of data processin' have made statistics a bleedin' key application of computin', begorrah. A number of statistical concepts have an important impact on a wide range of sciences. These include the bleedin' design of experiments and approaches to statistical inference such as Bayesian inference, each of which can be considered to have their own sequence in the feckin' development of the feckin' ideas underlyin' modern statistics.

## Introduction[edit]

By the 18th century, the feckin' term "statistics" designated the oul' systematic collection of demographic and economic data by states. Whisht now. For at least two millennia, these data were mainly tabulations of human and material resources that might be taxed or put to military use. Arra' would ye listen to this. In the oul' early 19th century, collection intensified, and the bleedin' meanin' of "statistics" broadened to include the bleedin' discipline concerned with the collection, summary, and analysis of data. Bejaysus here's a quare one right here now. Today, data is collected and statistics are computed and widely distributed in government, business, most of the feckin' sciences and sports, and even for many pastimes. Chrisht Almighty. Electronic computers have expedited more elaborate statistical computation even as they have facilitated the oul' collection and aggregation of data. Jesus, Mary and holy Saint Joseph. A single data analyst may have available a bleedin' set of data-files with millions of records, each with dozens or hundreds of separate measurements. Arra' would ye listen to this. These were collected over time from computer activity (for example, a bleedin' stock exchange) or from computerized sensors, point-of-sale registers, and so on. Sufferin' Jaysus listen to this. Computers then produce simple, accurate summaries, and allow more tedious analyses, such as those that require invertin' a holy large matrix or perform hundreds of steps of iteration, that would never be attempted by hand. Faster computin' has allowed statisticians to develop "computer-intensive" methods which may look at all permutations, or use randomization to look at 10,000 permutations of a problem, to estimate answers that are not easy to quantify by theory alone.

The term "mathematical statistics" designates the mathematical theories of probability and statistical inference, which are used in statistical practice. Here's a quare
one. The relation between statistics and probability theory developed rather late, however. Me head is hurtin' with
all this raidin'. In the bleedin' 19th century, statistics increasingly used probability theory, whose initial results were found in the oul' 17th and 18th centuries, particularly in the bleedin' analysis of games of chance (gamblin'). By 1800, astronomy used probability models and statistical theories, particularly the feckin' method of least squares. Would ye believe this
shite?Early probability theory and statistics was systematized in the bleedin' 19th century and statistical reasonin' and probability models were used by social scientists to advance the new sciences of experimental psychology and sociology, and by physical scientists in thermodynamics and statistical mechanics. I hope yiz
are all ears now. The development of statistical reasonin' was closely associated with the development of inductive logic and the bleedin' scientific method, which are concerns that move statisticians away from the bleedin' narrower area of mathematical statistics. Much of the feckin' theoretical work was readily available by the feckin' time computers were available to exploit them. Bejaysus. By the feckin' 1970s, Johnson and Kotz produced a four-volume *Compendium on Statistical Distributions* (1st ed., 1969-1972), which is still an invaluable resource.

Applied statistics can be regarded as not a bleedin' field of mathematics but an autonomous mathematical science, like computer science and operations research, so it is. Unlike mathematics, statistics had its origins in public administration. Would ye swally this in a minute now?Applications arose early in demography and economics; large areas of micro- and macro-economics today are "statistics" with an emphasis on time-series analyses. With its emphasis on learnin' from data and makin' best predictions, statistics also has been shaped by areas of academic research includin' psychological testin', medicine and epidemiology. The ideas of statistical testin' have considerable overlap with decision science. Right so. With its concerns with searchin' and effectively presentin' data, statistics has overlap with information science and computer science.

## Etymology[edit]

*Look up*statistics*in Wiktionary, the oul' free dictionary.*

The term *statistics* is ultimately derived from the New Latin *statisticum collegium* ("council of state") and the feckin' Italian word *statista* ("statesman" or "politician"). The German *Statistik*, first introduced by Gottfried Achenwall (1749), originally designated the bleedin' analysis of data about the feckin' state, signifyin' the feckin' "science of state" (then called *political arithmetic* in English). Stop the lights! It acquired the meanin' of the oul' collection and classification of data generally in the feckin' early 19th century, so it is. It was introduced into English in 1791 by Sir John Sinclair when he published the feckin' first of 21 volumes titled *Statistical Account of Scotland*.^{[1]}

Thus, the feckin' original principal purpose of *Statistik* was data to be used by governmental and (often centralized) administrative bodies. The collection of data about states and localities continues, largely through national and international statistical services.
Here's another quare one for ye. In particular, censuses provide frequently updated information about the feckin' population.

The first book to have 'statistics' in its title was "Contributions to Vital Statistics" (1845) by Francis GP Neison, actuary to the Medical Invalid and General Life Office.^{[citation needed]}

## Origins in probability theory[edit]

Basic forms of statistics have been used since the feckin' beginnin' of civilization. Early empires often collated censuses of the population or recorded the bleedin' trade in various commodities, the hoor. The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were some of the first states to extensively gather data on the bleedin' size of the empire's population, geographical area and wealth.

The use of statistical methods dates back to at least the 5th century BCE. The historian Thucydides in his *History of the oul' Peloponnesian War*^{[2]} describes how the Athenians calculated the oul' height of the feckin' wall of Platea by countin' the feckin' number of bricks in an unplastered section of the feckin' wall sufficiently near them to be able to count them. The count was repeated several times by a feckin' number of soldiers. Here's another quare one. The most frequent value (in modern terminology - the oul' mode ) so determined was taken to be the feckin' most likely value of the oul' number of bricks. In fairness
now. Multiplyin' this value by the oul' height of the oul' bricks used in the oul' wall allowed the oul' Athenians to determine the bleedin' height of the feckin' ladders necessary to scale the oul' walls.^{[citation needed]}

The Trial of the bleedin' Pyx is a test of the bleedin' purity of the bleedin' coinage of the oul' Royal Mint which has been held on a regular basis since the feckin' 12th century. The Trial itself is based on statistical samplin' methods. Bejaysus here's a quare one right here now. After mintin' a bleedin' series of coins - originally from ten pounds of silver - a single coin was placed in the bleedin' Pyx - a feckin' box in Westminster Abbey. After a given period - now once an oul' year - the coins are removed and weighed. A sample of coins removed from the oul' box are then tested for purity.

The *Nuova Cronica*, a 14th-century history of Florence by the feckin' Florentine banker and official Giovanni Villani, includes much statistical information on population, ordinances, commerce and trade, education, and religious facilities and has been described as the oul' first introduction of statistics as an oul' positive element in history,^{[3]} though neither the oul' term nor the oul' concept of statistics as a feckin' specific field yet existed.

The arithmetic mean, although an oul' concept known to the feckin' Greeks, was not generalised to more than two values until the 16th century. The invention of the feckin' decimal system by Simon Stevin in 1585 seems likely to have facilitated these calculations, begorrah. This method was first adopted in astronomy by Tycho Brahe who was attemptin' to reduce the errors in his estimates of the feckin' locations of various celestial bodies.

The idea of the median originated in Edward Wright's book on navigation (*Certaine Errors in Navigation*) in 1599 in a feckin' section concernin' the bleedin' determination of location with a holy compass. Wright felt that this value was the most likely to be the oul' correct value in a series of observations.

The birth of statistics is often dated to 1662, when John Graunt, along with William Petty, developed early human statistical and census methods that provided a feckin' framework for modern demography. He produced the feckin' first life table, givin' probabilities of survival to each age. Sufferin'
Jaysus. His book *Natural and Political Observations Made upon the bleedin' Bills of Mortality* used analysis of the mortality rolls to make the oul' first statistically based estimation of the bleedin' population of London, bedad. He knew that there were around 13,000 funerals per year in London and that three people died per eleven families per year, bejaysus. He estimated from the feckin' parish records that the feckin' average family size was 8 and calculated that the oul' population of London was about 384,000; this is the oul' first known use of a ratio estimator. Laplace in 1802 estimated the bleedin' population of France with a similar method; see Ratio estimator § History for details.

Although the oul' original scope of statistics was limited to data useful for governance, the approach was extended to many fields of a holy scientific or commercial nature durin' the bleedin' 19th century, the cute hoor. The mathematical foundations for the feckin' subject heavily drew on the new probability theory, pioneered in the bleedin' 16th century by Gerolamo Cardano, Pierre de Fermat and Blaise Pascal. In fairness
now. Christiaan Huygens (1657) gave the bleedin' earliest known scientific treatment of the feckin' subject. Jakob Bernoulli's *Ars Conjectandi* (posthumous, 1713) and Abraham de Moivre's *The Doctrine of Chances* (1718) treated the oul' subject as a bleedin' branch of mathematics. In his book Bernoulli introduced the bleedin' idea of representin' complete certainty as one and probability as an oul' number between zero and one.

A key early application of statistics in the oul' 18th century was to the human sex ratio at birth.^{[4]} John Arbuthnot studied this question in 1710.^{[5]}^{[6]}^{[7]}^{[8]} Arbuthnot examined birth records in London for each of the bleedin' 82 years from 1629 to 1710, bedad. In every year, the oul' number of males born in London exceeded the bleedin' number of females. C'mere til I tell ya now. Considerin' more male or more female births as equally likely, the probability of the oul' observed outcome is 0.5^82, or about 1 in 4,8360,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000; in modern terms, the feckin' *p*-value. C'mere til I tell ya. This is vanishingly small, leadin' Arbuthnot that this was not due to chance, but to divine providence: "From whence it follows, that it is Art, not Chance, that governs." This is and other work by Arbuthnot is credited as "the first use of significance tests"^{[9]} the feckin' first example of reasonin' about statistical significance and moral certainty,^{[10]} and "… perhaps the bleedin' first published report of a nonparametric test …",^{[6]} specifically the sign test; see details at Sign test § History.

The formal study of theory of errors may be traced back to Roger Cotes' *Opera Miscellanea* (posthumous, 1722), but an oul' memoir prepared by Thomas Simpson in 1755 (printed 1756) first applied the oul' theory to the feckin' discussion of errors of observation. The reprint (1757) of this memoir lays down the axioms that positive and negative errors are equally probable, and that there are certain assignable limits within which all errors may be supposed to fall; continuous errors are discussed and a probability curve is given. Simpson discussed several possible distributions of error, the cute hoor. He first considered the oul' uniform distribution and then the bleedin' discrete symmetric triangular distribution followed by the bleedin' continuous symmetric triangle distribution. Tobias Mayer, in his study of the bleedin' libration of the oul' moon (*Kosmographische Nachrichten*, Nuremberg, 1750), invented the oul' first formal method for estimatin' the feckin' unknown quantities by generalized the averagin' of observations under identical circumstances to the feckin' averagin' of groups of similar equations.

Roger Joseph Boscovich in 1755 based in his work on the bleedin' shape of the bleedin' earth proposed in his book *De Litteraria expeditione per pontificiam ditionem ad dimetiendos duos meridiani gradus a bleedin' PP. Be the hokey here's a quare wan. Maire et Boscovicli* that the feckin' true value of a feckin' series of observations would be that which minimises the feckin' sum of absolute errors. In modern terminology this value is the oul' median. Whisht now. The first example of what later became known as the feckin' normal curve was studied by Abraham de Moivre who plotted this curve on November 12, 1733.^{[11]} de Moivre was studyin' the number of heads that occurred when a feckin' 'fair' coin was tossed.

In 1761 Thomas Bayes proved Bayes' theorem and in 1765 Joseph Priestley invented the bleedin' first timeline charts.

Johann Heinrich Lambert in his 1765 book *Anlage zur Architectonic* proposed the semicircle as a bleedin' distribution of errors:

with -1 < *x* < 1.

Pierre-Simon Laplace (1774) made the first attempt to deduce a feckin' rule for the feckin' combination of observations from the oul' principles of the bleedin' theory of probabilities. He represented the bleedin' law of probability of errors by a feckin' curve and deduced a feckin' formula for the feckin' mean of three observations.

Laplace in 1774 noted that the feckin' frequency of an error could be expressed as an exponential function of its magnitude once its sign was disregarded.^{[12]}^{[13]} This distribution is now known as the bleedin' Laplace distribution.
Sufferin' Jaysus listen to this. Lagrange proposed a feckin' parabolic fractal distribution of errors in 1776.

Laplace in 1778 published his second law of errors wherein he noted that the feckin' frequency of an error was proportional to the feckin' exponential of the feckin' square of its magnitude. Chrisht Almighty. This was subsequently rediscovered by Gauss (possibly in 1795) and is now best known as the oul' normal distribution which is of central importance in statistics.^{[14]} This distribution was first referred to as the oul' *normal* distribution by C, the cute hoor. S, would ye swally that? Peirce in 1873 who was studyin' measurement errors when an object was dropped onto a feckin' wooden base.^{[15]} He chose the bleedin' term *normal* because of its frequent occurrence in naturally occurrin' variables.

Lagrange also suggested in 1781 two other distributions for errors - a raised cosine distribution and a feckin' logarithmic distribution.

Laplace gave (1781) a feckin' formula for the feckin' law of facility of error (a term due to Joseph Louis Lagrange, 1774), but one which led to unmanageable equations. Would ye swally this in a minute now?Daniel Bernoulli (1778) introduced the feckin' principle of the feckin' maximum product of the bleedin' probabilities of a system of concurrent errors.

In 1786 William Playfair (1759-1823) introduced the oul' idea of graphical representation into statistics. C'mere til I tell ya. He invented the oul' line chart, bar chart and histogram and incorporated them into his works on economics, the oul' *Commercial and Political Atlas*. This was followed in 1795 by his invention of the pie chart and circle chart which he used to display the evolution of England's imports and exports. Be the hokey here's a quare wan. These latter charts came to general attention when he published examples in his *Statistical Breviary* in 1801.

Laplace, in an investigation of the feckin' motions of Saturn and Jupiter in 1787, generalized Mayer's method by usin' different linear combinations of a feckin' single group of equations.

In 1791 Sir John Sinclair introduced the oul' term 'statistics' into English in his Statistical Accounts of Scotland.

In 1802 Laplace estimated the feckin' population of France to be 28,328,612.^{[16]} He calculated this figure usin' the feckin' number of births in the oul' previous year and census data for three communities. Would ye believe this
shite?The census data of these communities showed that they had 2,037,615 persons and that the number of births were 71,866, fair play. Assumin' that these samples were representative of France, Laplace produced his estimate for the oul' entire population.

The method of least squares, which was used to minimize errors in data measurement, was published independently by Adrien-Marie Legendre (1805), Robert Adrain (1808), and Carl Friedrich Gauss (1809). Here's a quare one for ye. Gauss had used the feckin' method in his famous 1801 prediction of the feckin' location of the bleedin' dwarf planet Ceres. C'mere til I tell ya now. The observations that Gauss based his calculations on were made by the feckin' Italian monk Piazzi.

The method of least squares was preceded by the oul' use a median regression shlope, the cute hoor. This method minimizin' the feckin' sum of the oul' absolute deviances. Story? A method of estimatin' this shlope was invented by Roger Joseph Boscovich in 1760 which he applied to astronomy.

The term *probable error* (*der wahrscheinliche Fehler*) - the median deviation from the mean - was introduced in 1815 by the bleedin' German astronomer Frederik Wilhelm Bessel. Bejaysus here's a quare one right here now. Antoine Augustin Cournot in 1843 was the bleedin' first to use the term *median* (*valeur médiane*) for the feckin' value that divides a feckin' probability distribution into two equal halves.

Other contributors to the feckin' theory of errors were Ellis (1844), De Morgan (1864), Glaisher (1872), and Giovanni Schiaparelli (1875).^{[citation needed]} Peters's (1856) formula for , the oul' "probable error" of a holy single observation was widely used and inspired early robust statistics (resistant to outliers: see Peirce's criterion).

In the 19th century authors on statistical theory included Laplace, S. Bejaysus this is a quare tale altogether. Lacroix (1816), Littrow (1833), Dedekind (1860), Helmert (1872), Laurent (1873), Liagre, Didion, De Morgan and Boole.

Gustav Theodor Fechner used the feckin' median (*Centralwerth*) in sociological and psychological phenomena.^{[17]} It had earlier been used only in astronomy and related fields. Bejaysus this
is a quare tale altogether. Francis Galton used the English term *median* for the bleedin' first time in 1881 havin' earlier used the oul' terms *middle-most value* in 1869 and the bleedin' *medium* in 1880.^{[18]}

Adolphe Quetelet (1796–1874), another important founder of statistics, introduced the bleedin' notion of the bleedin' "average man" (*l'homme moyen*) as an oul' means of understandin' complex social phenomena such as crime rates, marriage rates, and suicide rates.^{[19]}

The first tests of the feckin' normal distribution were invented by the bleedin' German statistician Wilhelm Lexis in the feckin' 1870s. The only data sets available to yer man that he was able to show were normally distributed were birth rates.

### Development of modern statistics[edit]

Although the feckin' origins of statistical theory lie in the feckin' 18th-century advances in probability, the bleedin' modern field of statistics only emerged in the oul' late-19th and early-20th century in three stages. In fairness
now. The first wave, at the feckin' turn of the bleedin' century, was led by the work of Francis Galton and Karl Pearson, who transformed statistics into a rigorous mathematical discipline used for analysis, not just in science, but in industry and politics as well. The second wave of the oul' 1910s and 20s was initiated by William Sealy Gosset, and reached its culmination in the oul' insights of Ronald Fisher. C'mere til I tell ya. This involved the oul' development of better design of experiments models, hypothesis testin' and techniques for use with small data samples. Jaysis. The final wave, which mainly saw the bleedin' refinement and expansion of earlier developments, emerged from the bleedin' collaborative work between Egon Pearson and Jerzy Neyman in the 1930s.^{[20]} Today, statistical methods are applied in all fields that involve decision makin', for makin' accurate inferences from a holy collated body of data and for makin' decisions in the oul' face of uncertainty based on statistical methodology.

The first statistical bodies were established in the bleedin' early 19th century, fair play. The Royal Statistical Society was founded in 1834 and Florence Nightingale, its first female member, pioneered the oul' application of statistical analysis to health problems for the furtherance of epidemiological understandin' and public health practice. However, the feckin' methods then used would not be considered as modern statistics today.

The Oxford scholar Francis Ysidro Edgeworth's book, *Metretike: or The Method of Measurin' Probability and Utility* (1887) dealt with probability as the oul' basis of inductive reasonin', and his later works focused on the feckin' 'philosophy of chance'.^{[21]} His first paper on statistics (1883) explored the feckin' law of error (normal distribution), and his *Methods of Statistics* (1885) introduced an early version of the oul' t distribution, the feckin' Edgeworth expansion, the feckin' Edgeworth series, the bleedin' method of variate transformation and the oul' asymptotic theory of maximum likelihood estimates.

The Norwegian Anders Nicolai Kiær introduced the concept of stratified samplin' in 1895.^{[22]} Arthur Lyon Bowley introduced new methods of data samplin' in 1906 when workin' on social statistics. Be the holy feck, this is a quare wan. Although statistical surveys of social conditions had started with Charles Booth's "Life and Labour of the feckin' People in London" (1889-1903) and Seebohm Rowntree's "Poverty, A Study of Town Life" (1901), Bowley's, key innovation consisted of the use of random samplin' techniques. C'mere til I tell ya now. His efforts culminated in his *New Survey of London Life and Labour*.^{[23]}

Francis Galton is credited as one of the feckin' principal founders of statistical theory, what? His contributions to the field included introducin' the concepts of standard deviation, correlation, regression and the application of these methods to the oul' study of the feckin' variety of human characteristics - height, weight, eyelash length among others. He found that many of these could be fitted to an oul' normal curve distribution.^{[24]}

Galton submitted a holy paper to *Nature* in 1907 on the bleedin' usefulness of the bleedin' median.^{[25]} He examined the feckin' accuracy of 787 guesses of the bleedin' weight of an ox at a country fair, for the craic. The actual weight was 1208 pounds: the bleedin' median guess was 1198. Stop the lights! The guesses were markedly non-normally distributed.

Galton's publication of *Natural Inheritance* in 1889 sparked the oul' interest of a bleedin' brilliant mathematician, Karl Pearson,^{[26]} then workin' at University College London, and he went on to found the oul' discipline of mathematical statistics.^{[27]} He emphasised the bleedin' statistical foundation of scientific laws and promoted its study and his laboratory attracted students from around the feckin' world attracted by his new methods of analysis, includin' Udny Yule. Bejaysus. His work grew to encompass the fields of biology, epidemiology, anthropometry, medicine and social history. Jesus, Mary and Joseph. In 1901, with Walter Weldon, founder of biometry, and Galton, he founded the oul' journal *Biometrika* as the feckin' first journal of mathematical statistics and biometry.

His work, and that of Galton's, underpins many of the bleedin' 'classical' statistical methods which are in common use today, includin' the oul' Correlation coefficient, defined as an oul' product-moment;^{[28]} the bleedin' method of moments for the bleedin' fittin' of distributions to samples; Pearson's system of continuous curves that forms the oul' basis of the bleedin' now conventional continuous probability distributions; Chi distance an oul' precursor and special case of the bleedin' Mahalanobis distance^{[29]} and P-value, defined as the feckin' probability measure of the oul' complement of the oul' ball with the feckin' hypothesized value as center point and chi distance as radius.^{[29]} He also introduced the term 'standard deviation'.

He also founded the feckin' statistical hypothesis testin' theory,^{[29]} Pearson's chi-squared test and principal component analysis.^{[30]}^{[31]} In 1911 he founded the bleedin' world's first university statistics department at University College London.

The second wave of mathematical statistics was pioneered by Ronald Fisher who wrote two textbooks, *Statistical Methods for Research Workers*, published in 1925 and *The Design of Experiments* in 1935, that were to define the feckin' academic discipline in universities around the bleedin' world, would ye believe it? He also systematized previous results, puttin' them on a holy firm mathematical footin'. In his 1918 seminal paper *The Correlation between Relatives on the oul' Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance*, the oul' first use to use the statistical term, variance. In 1919, at Rothamsted Experimental Station he started a major study of the bleedin' extensive collections of data recorded over many years.
Sufferin' Jaysus listen to this. This resulted in a holy series of reports under the bleedin' general title *Studies in Crop Variation.* In 1930 he published *The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection* where he applied statistics to evolution.

Over the bleedin' next seven years, he pioneered the feckin' principles of the bleedin' design of experiments (see below) and elaborated his studies of analysis of variance. Here's a quare one for ye. He furthered his studies of the statistics of small samples. Right so. Perhaps even more important, he began his systematic approach of the oul' analysis of real data as the oul' springboard for the feckin' development of new statistical methods. He developed computational algorithms for analyzin' data from his balanced experimental designs. Here's a quare one for ye. In 1925, this work resulted in the feckin' publication of his first book, *Statistical Methods for Research Workers*.^{[32]} This book went through many editions and translations in later years, and it became the bleedin' standard reference work for scientists in many disciplines, you know yourself like. In 1935, this book was followed by *The Design of Experiments*, which was also widely used.

In addition to analysis of variance, Fisher named and promoted the bleedin' method of maximum likelihood estimation. Be the hokey here's a quare wan. Fisher also originated the oul' concepts of sufficiency, ancillary statistics, Fisher's linear discriminator and Fisher information. His article *On a distribution yieldin' the error functions of several well known statistics* (1924) presented Pearson's chi-squared test and William Sealy Gosset's t in the oul' same framework as the bleedin' Gaussian distribution, and his own parameter in the oul' analysis of variance Fisher's z-distribution (more commonly used decades later in the feckin' form of the oul' F distribution).^{[33]}
The 5% level of significance appears to have been introduced by Fisher in 1925.^{[34]} Fisher stated that deviations exceedin' twice the bleedin' standard deviation are regarded as significant. Whisht now. Before this deviations exceedin' three times the bleedin' probable error were considered significant.
Whisht now and eist liom. For a bleedin' symmetrical distribution the bleedin' probable error is half the bleedin' interquartile range. Arra' would ye listen to this. For a holy normal distribution the bleedin' probable error is approximately 2/3 the oul' standard deviation. C'mere til I tell ya. It appears that Fisher's 5% criterion was rooted in previous practice.

Other important contributions at this time included Charles Spearman's rank correlation coefficient that was an oul' useful extension of the feckin' Pearson correlation coefficient, bedad. William Sealy Gosset, the feckin' English statistician better known under his pseudonym of *Student*, introduced Student's t-distribution, a continuous probability distribution useful in situations where the oul' sample size is small and population standard deviation is unknown.

Egon Pearson (Karl's son) and Jerzy Neyman introduced the feckin' concepts of "Type II" error, power of an oul' test and confidence intervals, to be sure. Jerzy Neyman in 1934 showed that stratified random samplin' was in general a better method of estimation than purposive (quota) samplin'.^{[35]}

## Design of experiments[edit]

This section relies too much on references to primary sources. (February 2012) |

In 1747, while servin' as surgeon on HM Bark *Salisbury*, James Lind carried out an oul' controlled experiment to develop a bleedin' cure for scurvy.^{[36]} In this study his subjects' cases "were as similar as I could have them", that is he provided strict entry requirements to reduce extraneous variation. Here's a quare one for ye. The men were paired, which provided blockin', you know yerself. From an oul' modern perspective, the bleedin' main thin' that is missin' is randomized allocation of subjects to treatments.

Lind is today often described as a feckin' one-factor-at-a-time experimenter.^{[37]} Similar one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) experimentation was performed at the oul' Rothamsted Research Station in the bleedin' 1840s by Sir John Lawes to determine the feckin' optimal inorganic fertilizer for use on wheat.^{[37]}

A theory of statistical inference was developed by Charles S. Chrisht Almighty. Peirce in "Illustrations of the bleedin' Logic of Science" (1877–1878) and "A Theory of Probable Inference" (1883), two publications that emphasized the bleedin' importance of randomization-based inference in statistics. Story? In another study, Peirce randomly assigned volunteers to a blinded, repeated-measures design to evaluate their ability to discriminate weights.^{[38]}^{[39]}^{[40]}^{[41]}

Peirce's experiment inspired other researchers in psychology and education, which developed a research tradition of randomized experiments in laboratories and specialized textbooks in the feckin' 1800s.^{[38]}^{[39]}^{[40]}^{[41]} Peirce also contributed the first English-language publication on an optimal design for regression-models in 1876.^{[42]} A pioneerin' optimal design for polynomial regression was suggested by Gergonne in 1815.^{[citation needed]} In 1918 Kirstine Smith published optimal designs for polynomials of degree six (and less).^{[43]}

The use of a holy sequence of experiments, where the bleedin' design of each may depend on the feckin' results of previous experiments, includin' the feckin' possible decision to stop experimentin', was pioneered^{[44]} by Abraham Wald in the context of sequential tests of statistical hypotheses.^{[45]} Surveys are available of optimal sequential designs,^{[46]} and of adaptive designs.^{[47]} One specific type of sequential design is the bleedin' "two-armed bandit", generalized to the bleedin' multi-armed bandit, on which early work was done by Herbert Robbins in 1952.^{[48]}

The term "design of experiments" (DOE) derives from early statistical work performed by Sir Ronald Fisher. He was described by Anders Hald as "a genius who almost single-handedly created the foundations for modern statistical science."^{[49]} Fisher initiated the principles of design of experiments and elaborated on his studies of "analysis of variance". Arra'
would ye listen to this shite? Perhaps even more important, Fisher began his systematic approach to the oul' analysis of real data as the feckin' springboard for the development of new statistical methods. Soft oul' day. He began to pay particular attention to the feckin' labour involved in the necessary computations performed by hand, and developed methods that were as practical as they were founded in rigour. Whisht now and listen to this wan. In 1925, this work culminated in the feckin' publication of his first book, *Statistical Methods for Research Workers*.^{[50]} This went into many editions and translations in later years, and became a standard reference work for scientists in many disciplines.^{[51]}

A methodology for designin' experiments was proposed by Ronald A. Me head is hurtin' with
all this raidin'. Fisher, in his innovative book *The Design of Experiments* (1935) which also became an oul' standard.^{[52]}^{[53]}^{[54]}^{[55]} As an example, he described how to test the hypothesis that a feckin' certain lady could distinguish by flavour alone whether the feckin' milk or the tea was first placed in the oul' cup. While this sounds like a holy frivolous application, it allowed yer man to illustrate the feckin' most important ideas of experimental design: see Lady tastin' tea.

Agricultural science advances served to meet the feckin' combination of larger city populations and fewer farms. Whisht now and listen to this wan. But for crop scientists to take due account of widely differin' geographical growin' climates and needs, it was important to differentiate local growin' conditions, what? To extrapolate experiments on local crops to a bleedin' national scale, they had to extend crop sample testin' economically to overall populations. As statistical methods advanced (primarily the oul' efficacy of designed experiments instead of one-factor-at-a-time experimentation), representative factorial design of experiments began to enable the bleedin' meaningful extension, by inference, of experimental samplin' results to the population as a bleedin' whole.^{[citation needed]} But it was hard to decide how representative was the crop sample chosen.^{[citation needed]} Factorial design methodology showed how to estimate and correct for any random variation within the oul' sample and also in the bleedin' data collection procedures.

## Bayesian statistics[edit]

The term *Bayesian* refers to Thomas Bayes (1702–1761), who proved that probabilistic limits could be placed on an unknown event. Jesus Mother of Chrisht almighty. However it was Pierre-Simon Laplace (1749–1827) who introduced (as principle VI) what is now called Bayes' theorem and applied it to celestial mechanics, medical statistics, reliability, and jurisprudence.^{[56]} When insufficient knowledge was available to specify an informed prior, Laplace used uniform priors, accordin' to his "principle of insufficient reason".^{[56]}^{[57]} Laplace assumed uniform priors for mathematical simplicity rather than for philosophical reasons.^{[56]} Laplace also introduced^{[citation needed]} primitive versions of conjugate priors and the theorem of von Mises and Bernstein, accordin' to which the oul' posteriors correspondin' to initially differin' priors ultimately agree, as the bleedin' number of observations increases.^{[58]} This early Bayesian inference, which used uniform priors followin' Laplace's principle of insufficient reason, was called "inverse probability" (because it infers backwards from observations to parameters, or from effects to causes^{[59]}).

After the 1920s, inverse probability was largely supplanted^{[citation needed]} by a holy collection of methods that were developed by Ronald A. Me head is hurtin' with
all this raidin'. Fisher, Jerzy Neyman and Egon Pearson, that's fierce now what? Their methods came to be called frequentist statistics.^{[59]} Fisher rejected the oul' Bayesian view, writin' that "the theory of inverse probability is founded upon an error, and must be wholly rejected".^{[60]} At the end of his life, however, Fisher expressed greater respect for the oul' essay of Bayes, which Fisher believed to have anticipated his own, fiducial approach to probability; Fisher still maintained that Laplace's views on probability were "fallacious rubbish".^{[60]} Neyman started out as an oul' "quasi-Bayesian", but subsequently developed confidence intervals (a key method in frequentist statistics) because "the whole theory would look nicer if it were built from the start without reference to Bayesianism and priors".^{[61]}
The word *Bayesian* appeared around 1950, and by the feckin' 1960s it became the oul' term preferred by those dissatisfied with the limitations of frequentist statistics.^{[59]}^{[62]}

In the feckin' 20th century, the oul' ideas of Laplace were further developed in two different directions, givin' rise to *objective* and *subjective* currents in Bayesian practice. In the objectivist stream, the oul' statistical analysis depends on only the feckin' model assumed and the bleedin' data analysed.^{[63]} No subjective decisions need to be involved. Whisht now. In contrast, "subjectivist" statisticians deny the possibility of fully objective analysis for the general case.

In the bleedin' further development of Laplace's ideas, subjective ideas predate objectivist positions, so it is. The idea that 'probability' should be interpreted as 'subjective degree of belief in a holy proposition' was proposed, for example, by John Maynard Keynes in the feckin' early 1920s.^{[citation needed]} This idea was taken further by Bruno de Finetti in Italy (*Fondamenti Logici del Ragionamento Probabilistico*, 1930) and Frank Ramsey in Cambridge (*The Foundations of Mathematics*, 1931).^{[64]} The approach was devised to solve problems with the oul' frequentist definition of probability but also with the feckin' earlier, objectivist approach of Laplace.^{[63]} The subjective Bayesian methods were further developed and popularized in the bleedin' 1950s by L.J. I hope yiz
are all ears now. Savage.^{[citation needed]}

Objective Bayesian inference was further developed by Harold Jeffreys at the bleedin' University of Cambridge. His seminal book "Theory of probability" first appeared in 1939 and played an important role in the bleedin' revival of the bleedin' Bayesian view of probability.^{[65]}^{[66]} In 1957, Edwin Jaynes promoted the concept of maximum entropy for constructin' priors, which is an important principle in the bleedin' formulation of objective methods, mainly for discrete problems, for the craic. In 1965, Dennis Lindley's 2-volume work "Introduction to Probability and Statistics from a Bayesian Viewpoint" brought Bayesian methods to a feckin' wide audience. In 1979, José-Miguel Bernardo introduced reference analysis,^{[63]} which offers a feckin' general applicable framework for objective analysis.^{[67]} Other well-known proponents of Bayesian probability theory include I.J, for the craic. Good, B.O. Koopman, Howard Raiffa, Robert Schlaifer and Alan Turin'.

In the 1980s, there was a holy dramatic growth in research and applications of Bayesian methods, mostly attributed to the bleedin' discovery of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, which removed many of the computational problems, and an increasin' interest in nonstandard, complex applications.^{[68]} Despite growth of Bayesian research, most undergraduate teachin' is still based on frequentist statistics.^{[69]} Nonetheless, Bayesian methods are widely accepted and used, such as for example in the oul' field of machine learnin'.^{[70]}

## Important contributors to statistics[edit]

## References[edit]

**^**Ball, Philip (2004).*Critical Mass*. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Be the hokey here's a quare wan. p. 53, so it is. ISBN 978-0-374-53041-9.**^**Thucydides (1985). Sure this is it.*History of the Peloponnesian War*. New York: Penguin Books, Ltd, the cute hoor. p. 204.**^**Villani, Giovanni. Encyclopædia Britannica. Whisht now. Encyclopædia Britannica 2006 Ultimate Reference Suite DVD. Jaysis. Retrieved on 2008-03-04.**^**Brian, Éric; Jaisson, Marie (2007). "Physico-Theology and Mathematics (1710–1794)", Lord bless us and save us.*The Descent of Human Sex Ratio at Birth*, would ye believe it? Springer Science & Business Media. Jesus, Mary and holy Saint Joseph. pp. 1–25. G'wan now and listen to this wan. ISBN 978-1-4020-6036-6.**^**John Arbuthnot (1710). "An argument for Divine Providence, taken from the feckin' constant regularity observed in the bleedin' births of both sexes" (PDF). Story?*Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London*.**27**(325–336): 186–190. doi:10.1098/rstl.1710.0011. S2CID 186209819.- ^
^{a}^{b}Conover, W.J. Here's another quare one. (1999), "Chapter 3.4: The Sign Test",*Practical Nonparametric Statistics*(Third ed.), Wiley, pp. 157–176, ISBN 978-0-471-16068-7 **^**Sprent, P. Holy blatherin' Joseph, listen to this. (1989),*Applied Nonparametric Statistical Methods*(Second ed.), Chapman & Hall, ISBN 978-0-412-44980-2**^**Stigler, Stephen M. G'wan now and listen to this wan. (1986). Jaysis.*The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty Before 1900*, fair play. Harvard University Press, the cute hoor. pp. 225–226. C'mere til I tell ya now. ISBN 978-0-67440341-3.**^**Bellhouse, P. (2001), "John Arbuthnot",*in Statisticians of the oul' Centuries by C.C, you know yerself. Heyde and E. Whisht now and eist liom. Seneta*, Springer, pp. 39–42, ISBN 978-0-387-95329-8**^**Hald, Anders (1998), "Chapter 4. Would ye swally this in a minute now?Chance or Design: Tests of Significance",*A History of Mathematical Statistics from 1750 to 1930*, Wiley, p. 65**^**de Moivre, A. Chrisht Almighty. (1738) The doctrine of chances. Chrisht Almighty. Woodfall**^**Laplace, P-S (1774), for the craic. "Mémoire sur la probabilité des causes par les évènements". Would ye swally this in a minute now?*Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences Présentés par Divers Savants*. G'wan now and listen to this wan.**6**: 621–656.**^**Wilson, Edwin Bidwell (1923) "First and second laws of error",*Journal of the oul' American Statistical Association*, 18 (143), 841-851 JSTOR 2965467**^**Havil J (2003)*Gamma: Explorin' Euler's Constant*. Arra' would ye listen to this shite? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, p. Right so. 157**^**C, like. S. Peirce (1873) Theory of errors of observations. Holy blatherin' Joseph, listen to this. Report of the oul' Superintendent US Coast Survey, Washington, Government Printin' Office. Appendix no, Lord bless us and save us. 21: 200-224**^**Cochran W.G, grand so. (1978) "Laplace's ratio estimators". Holy blatherin' Joseph, listen to this. pp 3-10. In David H.A., (ed). Arra' would ye listen to this shite?*Contributions to Survey Samplin' and Applied Statistics: papers in honor of H. O. Soft oul' day. Hartley*. Academic Press, New York ISBN 978-1483237930**^**Keynes, JM (1921) A treatise on probability. Jaykers! Pt II Ch XVII §5 (p 201)**^**Galton F (1881) Report of the bleedin' Anthropometric Committee pp 245-260. Report of the feckin' 51st Meetin' of the oul' British Association for the oul' Advancement of Science**^**Stigler (1986, Chapter 5: Quetelet's Two Attempts)**^**Helen Mary Walker (1975).*Studies in the oul' history of statistical method*. Jasus. Arno Press. Bejaysus here's a quare one right here now. ISBN 9780405066283.**^**(Stigler 1986, Chapter 9: The Next Generation: Edgeworth)**^**Bellhouse DR (1988) A brief history of random samplin' methods. Handbook of statistics. Whisht now and listen to this wan. Vol 6 pp 1-14 Elsevier**^**Bowley, AL (1906). "Address to the feckin' Economic Science and Statistics Section of the oul' British Association for the feckin' Advancement of Science".*J R Stat Soc*. Arra' would ye listen to this.**69**: 548–557. Be the holy feck, this is a quare wan. doi:10.2307/2339344. Stop the lights! JSTOR 2339344.**^**Galton, F (1877). "Typical laws of heredity", the cute hoor.*Nature*.**15**(388): 492–553. doi:10.1038/015492a0.**^**Galton, F (1907). "One Vote, One Value", game ball!*Nature*.**75**(1948): 414. Story? doi:10.1038/075414a0. Jesus, Mary and holy Saint Joseph. S2CID 4053860.**^**Stigler (1986, Chapter 10: Pearson and Yule)**^**Varberg, Dale E. Whisht now and eist liom. (1963). "The development of modern statistics".*The Mathematics Teacher*, to be sure.**56**(4): 252–257. Story? JSTOR 27956805.**^**Stigler, S. Jaykers! M. (1989). Here's a quare one. "Francis Galton's Account of the bleedin' Invention of Correlation". Holy blatherin' Joseph, listen to this.*Statistical Science*. Jesus Mother of Chrisht almighty.**4**(2): 73–79. doi:10.1214/ss/1177012580.- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}Pearson, K. (1900). Jaysis. "On the oul' Criterion that a feckin' given System of Deviations from the Probable in the feckin' Case of a Correlated System of Variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from Random Samplin'", you know yourself like.*Philosophical Magazine*, like. Series 5. C'mere til I tell ya now.**50**(302): 157–175. doi:10.1080/14786440009463897. **^**Pearson, K. (1901), enda story. "On Lines and Planes of Closest Fit to Systems of Points is Space", would ye swally that?*Philosophical Magazine*, be the hokey! Series 6.**2**(11): 559–572, you know yerself. doi:10.1080/14786440109462720.**^**Jolliffe, I. T. (2002).*Principal Component Analysis, 2nd ed*. C'mere til I tell ya. New York: Springer-Verlag.**^**Box,*R. A, the shitehawk. Fisher*, pp 93–166**^**Agresti, Alan; David B. Whisht now. Hichcock (2005), be the hokey! "Bayesian Inference for Categorical Data Analysis" (PDF).*Statistical Methods & Applications*. C'mere til I tell ya now.**14**(3): 298. doi:10.1007/s10260-005-0121-y. S2CID 18896230.**^**Fisher RA (1925) Statistical methods for research workers, Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd**^**Neyman, J (1934) On the two different aspects of the oul' representative method: The method of stratified samplin' and the method of purposive selection.*Journal of the bleedin' Royal Statistical Society*97 (4) 557-625 JSTOR 2342192**^**Dunn, Peter (January 1997). Chrisht Almighty. "James Lind (1716-94) of Edinburgh and the bleedin' treatment of scurvy".*Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition*.**76**(1): 64–65. C'mere til I tell yiz. doi:10.1136/fn.76.1.F64. PMC 1720613. PMID 9059193.- ^
^{a}^{b}Klaus Hinkelmann (2012), so it is.*Design and Analysis of Experiments, Special Designs and Applications*, game ball! John Wiley & Sons. p. xvii. C'mere til I tell ya now. ISBN 9780470530689. - ^
^{a}^{b}Charles Sanders Peirce and Joseph Jastrow (1885). Jesus Mother of Chrisht almighty. "On Small Differences in Sensation". C'mere til I tell yiz.*Memoirs of the oul' National Academy of Sciences*, the cute hoor.**3**: 73–83. - ^
^{a}^{b}Hackin', Ian (September 1988). Jesus Mother of Chrisht almighty. "Telepathy: Origins of Randomization in Experimental Design".*Isis*, you know yourself like.**79**(A Special Issue on Artifact and Experiment, number 3): 427–451, game ball! doi:10.1086/354775. JSTOR 234674. MR 1013489. - ^
^{a}^{b}Stephen M. Stigler (November 1992). Me head is hurtin' with all this raidin'. "A Historical View of Statistical Concepts in Psychology and Educational Research".*American Journal of Education*. Sufferin' Jaysus listen to this.**101**(1): 60–70. Jaykers! doi:10.1086/444032. - ^
^{a}^{b}Trudy Dehue (December 1997). Be the holy feck, this is a quare wan. "Deception, Efficiency, and Random Groups: Psychology and the oul' Gradual Origination of the oul' Random Group Design" (PDF), the shitehawk.*Isis*. C'mere til I tell yiz.**88**(4): 653–673. doi:10.1086/383850. Sufferin' Jaysus. PMID 9519574. **^**Peirce, C, what? S. (1876). Stop the lights! "Note on the bleedin' Theory of the bleedin' Economy of Research". Jasus.*Coast Survey Report*: 197–201., actually published 1879, NOAA PDF Eprint.

Reprinted in*Collected Papers***7**, paragraphs 139–157, also in*Writings***4**, pp. Jaykers! 72–78, and in Peirce, C.S. (July–August 1967). "Note on the bleedin' Theory of the Economy of Research". Holy blatherin' Joseph, listen to this.*Operations Research*.**15**(4): 643–648. Here's a quare one for ye. doi:10.1287/opre.15.4.643. JSTOR 168276.**^**Smith, Kirstine (1918). Here's another quare one. "On the feckin' Standard Deviations of Adjusted and Interpolated Values of an Observed Polynomial Function and its Constants and the feckin' Guidance they give Towards a bleedin' Proper Choice of the Distribution of Observations". Be the hokey here's a quare wan.*Biometrika*.**12**(1/2): 1–85. doi:10.2307/2331929. Jesus, Mary and Joseph. JSTOR 2331929.**^**Johnson, N.L. Right so. (1961). Bejaysus. "Sequential analysis: a feckin' survey."*Journal of the Royal Statistical Society*, Series A. Vol, you know yourself like. 124 (3), 372–411. (pages 375–376)**^**Wald, A. Arra' would ye listen to this shite? (1945) "Sequential Tests of Statistical Hypotheses", Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 16 (2), 117–186.**^**Chernoff, H. (1972)*Sequential Analysis and Optimal Design*, SIAM Monograph, so it is. ISBN 978-0898710069**^**Zacks, S. (1996) "Adaptive Designs for Parametric Models". In: Ghosh, S, you know yerself. and Rao, C. G'wan now. R., (Eds) (1996), would ye believe it? "Design and Analysis of Experiments,"*Handbook of Statistics*, Volume 13. Chrisht Almighty. North-Holland. ISBN 0-444-82061-2. Here's another quare one for ye. (pages 151–180)**^**Robbins, H, you know yourself like. (1952). Right so. "Some Aspects of the feckin' Sequential Design of Experiments", you know yerself.*Bulletin of the feckin' American Mathematical Society*. Listen up now to this fierce wan.**58**(5): 527–535. Here's a quare one. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.335.3232, fair play. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1952-09620-8.**^**Hald, Anders (1998)*A History of Mathematical Statistics*. Be the holy feck, this is a quare wan. New York: Wiley.^{[page needed]}**^**Box, Joan Fisher (1978)*R, you know yerself. A. Fisher: The Life of a feckin' Scientist*, Wiley. In fairness now. ISBN 0-471-09300-9 (pp 93–166)**^**Edwards, A.W.F. Arra' would ye listen to this. (2005). C'mere til I tell ya. "R, like. A. Jaykers! Fisher, Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 1925". Jesus, Mary and holy Saint Joseph. In Grattan-Guinness, Ivor (ed.).*Landmark writings in Western mathematics 1640-1940*. In fairness now. Amsterdam Boston: Elsevier. Chrisht Almighty. ISBN 9780444508713.**^**Stanley, J. Jesus Mother of Chrisht almighty. C. Story? (1966), you know yourself like. "The Influence of Fisher's "The Design of Experiments" on Educational Research Thirty Years Later".*American Educational Research Journal*.**3**(3): 223–229, enda story. doi:10.3102/00028312003003223. Soft oul' day. S2CID 145725524.**^**Box, JF (February 1980), what? "R. Here's a quare one. A, that's fierce now what? Fisher and the feckin' Design of Experiments, 1922-1926".*The American Statistician*. Listen up now to this fierce wan.**34**(1): 1–7. In fairness now. doi:10.2307/2682986, you know yourself like. JSTOR 2682986.**^**Yates, Frank (June 1964). Would ye swally this in a minute now?"Sir Ronald Fisher and the bleedin' Design of Experiments", begorrah.*Biometrics*.**20**(2): 307–321. C'mere til I tell yiz. doi:10.2307/2528399, you know yerself. JSTOR 2528399.**^**Stanley, Julian C. Bejaysus. (1966). "The Influence of Fisher's "The Design of Experiments" on Educational Research Thirty Years Later". Jesus Mother of Chrisht almighty.*American Educational Research Journal*, begorrah.**3**(3): 223–229, begorrah. doi:10.3102/00028312003003223, to be sure. JSTOR 1161806. C'mere til I tell ya. S2CID 145725524.- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}Stigler (1986, Chapter 3: Inverse Probability) **^**Hald (1998)^{[page needed]}**^**Lucien Le Cam (1986)*Asymptotic Methods in Statistical Decision Theory*: Pages 336 and 618–621 (von Mises and Bernstein).- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}Stephen. Bejaysus this is a quare tale altogether. E. Fienberg, (2006) When did Bayesian Inference become "Bayesian"? Archived 2014-09-10 at the oul' Wayback Machine*Bayesian Analysis*, 1 (1), 1–40. See page 5. - ^
^{a}^{b}Aldrich, A (2008). "R. Jaykers! A. Fisher on Bayes and Bayes' Theorem" (PDF). Story?*Bayesian Analysis*, game ball!**3**(1): 161–170. Jaysis. doi:10.1214/08-ba306. **^**Neyman, J, would ye swally that? (1977). Be the hokey here's a quare wan. "Frequentist probability and frequentist statistics". Jesus, Mary and Joseph.*Synthese*.**36**(1): 97–131. doi:10.1007/BF00485695. Here's a quare one for ye. S2CID 46968744.**^**Jeff Miller, "Earliest Known Uses of Some of the Words of Mathematics (B)" "The term Bayesian entered circulation around 1950. R. A. C'mere til I tell ya. Fisher used it in the feckin' notes he wrote to accompany the papers in his Contributions to Mathematical Statistics (1950). Fisher thought Bayes's argument was all but extinct for the only recent work to take it seriously was Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability (1939). In 1951 L. Be the holy feck, this is a quare wan. J. Be the hokey here's a quare wan. Savage, reviewin' Wald's Statistical Decisions Functions, referred to "modern, or unBayesian, statistical theory" ("The Theory of Statistical Decision,"*Journal of the feckin' American Statistical Association*, 46, p. 58.). Would ye believe this shite?Soon after, however, Savage changed from bein' an unBayesian to bein' an oul' Bayesian."- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}Bernardo J (2005). In fairness now. "Reference analysis", the cute hoor.*Bayesian Thinkin' - Modelin' and Computation*. Right so. Handbook of Statistics. Be the hokey here's a quare wan.**25**. pp. 17–90. doi:10.1016/S0169-7161(05)25002-2. G'wan now and listen to this wan. ISBN 9780444515391. **^**Gillies, D. (2000),*Philosophical Theories of Probability*. Me head is hurtin' with all this raidin'. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-18276-X pp 50–1**^**E. T. Jesus, Mary and holy Saint Joseph. Jaynes.*Probability Theory: The Logic of Science*Cambridge University Press, (2003). Sure this is it. ISBN 0-521-59271-2**^**O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., "History of statistics",*MacTutor History of Mathematics archive*, University of St Andrews**^**Bernardo, J. M. and Smith, A. F. Bejaysus this is a quare tale altogether. M. Jasus. (1994), so it is. "Bayesian Theory". Chichester: Wiley.**^**Wolpert, RL (2004), the hoor. "A conversation with James O. Here's another quare one. Berger", what?*Statistical Science*.**9**: 205–218. G'wan now and listen to this wan. doi:10.1214/088342304000000053. In fairness now. MR 2082155.**^**Bernardo, J, you know yerself. M. (2006). Whisht now and listen to this wan. "A Bayesian Mathematical Statistics Primer" (PDF).*Proceedings of the bleedin' Seventh International Conference on Teachin' Statistics [CDROM]*. Salvador (Bahia), Brazil: International Association for Statistical Education.**^**Bishop, C.M. (2007)*Pattern Recognition and Machine Learnin'*. Springer ISBN 978-0387310732

## Bibliography[edit]

- Freedman, D. Be the holy feck, this is a quare wan. (1999), bejaysus. "From association to causation: Some remarks on the feckin' history of statistics". G'wan now.
*Statistical Science*. Bejaysus here's a quare one right here now.**14**(3): 243–258. Would ye swally this in a minute now?doi:10.1214/ss/1009212409. (Revised version, 2002) - Hald, Anders (2003).
*A History of Probability and Statistics and Their Applications before 1750*. Holy blatherin' Joseph, listen to this. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-47129-5. - Hald, Anders (1998).
*A History of Mathematical Statistics from 1750 to 1930*. Chrisht Almighty. New York: Wiley, enda story. ISBN 978-0-471-17912-2. - Kotz, S., Johnson, N.L. (1992,1992,1997), would ye believe it?
*Breakthroughs in Statistics*, Vols I, II, III. Springer ISBN 0-387-94037-5, ISBN 0-387-94039-1, ISBN 0-387-94989-5 - Pearson, Egon (1978). C'mere til
I tell yiz.
*The History of Statistics in the bleedin' 17th and 18th Centuries against the feckin' changin' background of intellectual, scientific and religious thought (Lectures by Karl Pearson given at University College London durin' the oul' academic sessions 1921-1933)*. New York: MacMillan Publishin' Co., Inc. p. 744. Bejaysus this is a quare tale altogether. ISBN 978-0-02-850120-8. - Salsburg, David (2001). Be the hokey here's a quare wan.
*The Lady Tastin' Tea: How Statistics Revolutionized Science in the Twentieth Century*. ISBN 0-7167-4106-7 - Stigler, Stephen M. (1986), game ball!
*The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900*. Sufferin' Jaysus listen to this. Belknap Press/Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-40341-3. - Stigler, Stephen M. Arra' would ye listen to this. (1999)
*Statistics on the feckin' Table: The History of Statistical Concepts and Methods*. C'mere til I tell ya now. Harvard University Press, the shitehawk. ISBN 0-674-83601-4 - David, H. A. (1995). Would ye swally this in a minute now?"First (?) Occurrence of Common Terms in Mathematical Statistics",
grand so.
*The American Statistician*. Chrisht Almighty.**49**(2): 121–133. Bejaysus this is a quare tale altogether. doi:10.2307/2684625. Sure this is it. JSTOR 2684625.

## External links[edit]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to History of statistics. |

- JEHPS: Recent publications in the oul' history of probability and statistics
- Electronic Journ@l for History of Probability and Statistics/Journ@l Electronique d'Histoire des Probabilités et de la Statistique
- Figures from the oul' History of Probability and Statistics (Univ. Sufferin' Jaysus listen to this. of Southampton)
- Materials for the feckin' History of Statistics (Univ. Be the hokey here's a quare wan. of York)
- Probability and Statistics on the Earliest Uses Pages (Univ, Lord bless us and save us. of Southampton)
- Earliest Uses of Symbols in Probability and Statistics on Earliest Uses of Various Mathematical Symbols